This ruling relates to preliminary points of objection
brought by the Respondent’s counsel herein. In his first point of objection, he
contends that Civil Appeal Number 25 of 2014 which the two Appellants, filed on
28th March, 2014 is incompetent; because it was initiated by a
Notice of Appeal which was in the view of the learned Counsel, improperly
sought before and granted by the High Court. The counsel, had an alternative
point of objection, where he similarly contends that the present appeal is
incompetent from the perspectives of decision of this Court in Civil Appeal No.
33 of 2013 (between the Appellants herein and Respondent herein). The court
considered as to whether the two points of preliminary objection which have
been raised on behalf of the Respondent, meet the threshold of being pure point
of law which, if argued as a preliminary objection may dispose of the appeal.