The applicant was the plaintiff in Commercial Case No. 10 of 2017, which was pending before the High Court. In the course of the proceedings, a number of applications were filed among which was one that asked the trial Judge to recuse himself from handling the matter. Upon refusal by the trial Judge to recuse, the applicant lodged Commercial Review No. 10 of 2017, requesting the learned Judge to review his decision. The application was again dismissed for want of merit and thereby, triggered the current application to this Court to revise the decision of the High Court. The court, suo motu, prompted the learned Counsel to address it on the issue as to whether or not, the decision sought by the applicant to be revised is appealable. The court also sought to know, if the answer is in the affirmative, whether there was any legal justification for the applicant to prefer an application for revision instead of appealing against the complained decision of the High Court. The applicant stated that, there were irregularities in the proceedings of the High Court that included, denial of the right to be heard in the application for review.