The Appellant was acquitted by Tarime urban Primary Court from a charge of threatening violence contrary to section 89(2)(b) of the Penal Code [Cap 16 R.E. 2002] but convicted on a different ground that the Appellant was guilty of causing disturbances contrary to section 89(1)(b) of the Penal Code [Cap 16 R.E. 2002] and sentenced to six months condition discharge. Aggrieved by the decision, the Appellant preferred this appeal on the grounds inter alia that the lower appellate court erred in its finding and decision to convict the Appellant with the offence, which was not proved during the trial.